Self-employed set for penalty reprieve
Over 1m people missed the 31 January filing deadline last week and will shortly be receiving automatic £100 penalties as a result. However, HMRC has announced that the penalty won’t be enforced for the self-employed - but only in limited circumstances. Are you eligible?

Penalties for late filing are applied in stages, with the first being a £100 penalty where the tax return is not filed by midnight on 31 January following the end of the relevant tax year, i.e. 31 January 2025 for the 2023/24 year. There are sometimes blanket extensions to the deadline, e.g. during the pandemic, but in other cases a penalty might be waived if the taxpayer has a “reasonable” excuse.
There is good news for sole traders and partnerships for 2023/24 due to the disruption caused by basis period reform. In its latest Stakeholder Digest, HMRC has announced that where such taxpayers requested an overlap relief figure from HMRC before 31 January but did not receive a response by that date, an extension to 28 February will apply. It is not clear from the announcement whether this extension will apply automatically, or whether those affected will need to appeal using a reasonable excuse argument.
The Digest also advises filing the return using estimated figures in the meantime and amending later on. This will allow an estimate of the tax to be paid. Don’t forget, interest will always be added to late-paid tax, even where a late filing penalty is waived.
Related Topics
-
Delay salary to save tax
As a company owner manager, you decide when to take income from your business. If that’s your only source of income, tax planning is relatively simple but it’s trickier if you have other sources. What’s the best strategy to improve tax efficiency?
-
Loan written off: are you in HMRC’s crosshairs?
HMRC is writing to directors that took a loan from their company that was later written off or released. What should you do if you receive a letter?
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?