Can employers use the furlough scheme for self-isolating staff?
With news of increasing numbers of staff being contacted by NHS Test and Trace or being “pinged” by the NHS COVID-19 app, can employers use the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) for staff who have to self-isolate?

It’s clear from HMRC’s CJRS guidance that if an employee becomes sick while furloughed, they can remain on furlough, and they don’t have to be moved on to SSP. However, the guidance is less clear on whether a self-isolating employee who would otherwise be working can be placed on furlough during their self-isolation period, instead of being paid SSP. The guidance states that the CJRS is “not intended for short-term absences from work due to sickness”. It then goes on to say that “short-term illness or self-isolation should not be a consideration when deciding if you should furlough an employee. If, however, employers want to furlough employees for business reasons and they are currently off sick, they are eligible to do so, as with other employees”.
The specific wording in the latest Treasury Direction, which is the legal document that implements the CJRS, arguably means that employers can legally use the CJRS for employees whose employment activities have been adversely affected by the coronavirus, including those who can’t work because they’re having to self-isolate at home as a measure to limit further virus transmission.
Related Topics
-
Delay salary to save tax
As a company owner manager, you decide when to take income from your business. If that’s your only source of income, tax planning is relatively simple but it’s trickier if you have other sources. What’s the best strategy to improve tax efficiency?
-
Loan written off: are you in HMRC’s crosshairs?
HMRC is writing to directors that took a loan from their company that was later written off or released. What should you do if you receive a letter?
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?