Advisory fuel rates from 1 March 2024 published
The approved amount that employers can reimburse staff for business travel in company cars changes from 1 March 2024. What are the new rates?

Advisory fuel rates for company cars are updated on a quarterly basis due to fluctuations in fuel prices. The rates determine the amount that can be paid to an employee using a company car for business mileage, without income tax consequences. HMRC has now published the advisory rates applicable from 1 March 2024. The rates for diesel and petrol engines have decreased, whilst LPG rates have increased.
The rates per mile will be:
Engine size |
Petrol |
LPG |
1,400cc or less |
13p |
11p |
1,401cc to 2,000cc |
15p |
13p |
Over 2,000cc |
24p |
21p |
Engine size |
Diesel |
1,600cc or less |
12p |
1,601cc to 2,000cc |
14p |
Over 2,000cc |
19p |
The rate for fully electric vehicles remains unchanged from the previous quarter at 9p per mile. Hybrid cars are treated as either petrol or diesel cars for the purposes of advisory fuel rates.
These rates apply from 1 March 2024, but you can still use the previous rates for one month from that date. Those with diesel or petrol engines and high mileage for February would be slightly better off by using the rates for the current quarter (13p, 15p and 20p per mile for diesel and 14p, 16p and 26p per mile for petrol).
Related Topics
-
Delay salary to save tax
As a company owner manager, you decide when to take income from your business. If that’s your only source of income, tax planning is relatively simple but it’s trickier if you have other sources. What’s the best strategy to improve tax efficiency?
-
Loan written off: are you in HMRC’s crosshairs?
HMRC is writing to directors that took a loan from their company that was later written off or released. What should you do if you receive a letter?
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?